College FootballLoading Scores…All Games →
Published AP Ballots — 11 Verified Current-Season Polls

An updated report is being checked. These statistics show the last verified version.

Football Games / October 31, 2026

Utah at Cincinnati

The result, the player statistics, and the AP poll response.

Final

Saturday, October 31 at 2:45 PM CDT · Nippert Stadium

AP at Kickoff: #6

49

AP at Kickoff: NR

25
Utah Wins by 24Following Poll: Utah #3 · Cincinnati NR

Pregame Lines

Total O/U 56.5
Utah
Spread −7.5Moneyline −250
Cincinnati
Spread +7.5Moneyline +210

Captured before kickoff: · CFBD scoreboard.

These are saved pregame prices. The provider does not identify the sportsbook or its price-update time. A dash means unavailable.

Last Update: · 18293 Minutes Ago
The Poll Response

Utah in the Following AP Poll

Utah's 24-point win on October 31 was followed by the November 1 AP poll.

AP Rank#6 → #3
Voters Ranking Utah70 → 70Of 70 → 70 voters
Left Unranked0In the Following Poll
Compare the Pregame and Following Ballots →
Player Leaders

Offensive Leaders

JC FrenchPassing Leader
263Yards
Cole TabbRushing Leader
131Yards
Hunter AndrewsReceiving Leader
112Yards
All Player Statistics →

AP & Voters

How voters ranked these teams before the game, and what changed in the next poll.

Before Kickoff

October 25 AP Poll · 70 Complete Ballots

AP Rank#6
Ranked By70 / 70
Left Unranked0 / 70
AP RankNR
Ranked By6 / 70
Left Unranked64 / 70
6Ranked Both Teams
0Ranked Neither Team

Among voters ranking both: 6 placed Utah higher; 0 placed Cincinnati higher. Rankings are not game predictions.

Explore the Pregame Poll →

In the Following Poll

November 1 AP Poll

Before Kickoff#6
Following Poll#3

70 of 70 → 70 of 70 voters ranked Utah.

0 Left UnrankedRanked Votes: #1–#8
Before KickoffNR
Following PollNR

6 of 70 → 0 of 70 voters ranked Cincinnati.

70 Left Unranked

Voter counts can change between polls. This describes what changed, not why each voter changed their ballot.

Explore the Following Poll →

Player Stats

Choose a team and category to explore every available player.

PlayerC/ATTYDSTDINT
Devon Dampier22/292609.021
Byrd Ficklin1/263.000

Utah · Passing. A dash means unavailable. Dotted terms have explanations on hover, focus or tap.

2026 Season

Season Before This Game

Results from completed games before kickoff. Points are per game and include all opponents.

Record
7–0
Points Scored
37.4
Points Allowed
14.6

7 Completed Games

Record
5–2
Points Scored
35.4
Points Allowed
26.4

7 Completed Games

Team Stats

Final team statistics.

Statistic
Total Yards534456
Passing Yards266263
Rushing Yards268193
Turnovers22
Third Downs7-113-11
Possession35:3024:30
Full Team Box Score
StatisticUtahCincinnati
Rushing Touchdowns22
Punt Return Yards1-3
Punt Return Touchdowns00
Punt Returns11
Passing Touchdowns20
Kick Return Yards3815
Kick Return Touchdowns00
Kick Returns31
Kicking Points77
Interception Return Yards3979
Interception Return Touchdowns11
Passes Intercepted11
Fumbles Recovered11
Total Fumbles21
Tackles for Loss66
Defensive Touchdowns21
Tackles2938
Sacks30
Quarterback Hurries52
Passes Deflected41
Possession35:3024:30
Interceptions Thrown11
Fumbles Lost11
Turnovers22
Penalties / Yards3-256-42
Yards per Carry6.46.0
Rushing Attempts4232
Rushing Yards268193
Yards per Pass Attempt8.68.8
Completions / Attempts23-3116-30
Passing Yards266263
Total Yards534456
Fourth Downs0-20-2
Third Downs7-113-11
First Downs2718
Score by Quarter
TeamQ1Q2Q3Q4Final
Utah14287049
Cincinnati3313625

Advanced Analysis

Compare this game with a measured season average and the typical range.

The Comparison Sample

2026 FBS vs. FBS games started before October 31 at 3:45 PM EDT. 453 of 480 eligible games have both offenses available. Each team-game counts equally; both offenses need at least 20 included plays.

These comparisons include garbage-time plays and are not opponent-adjusted. A typical range describes the middle half of this sample, not a universal good/bad cutoff.

Offensive Value per Play

· Higher means more expected scoring value gained.

Sample Average0.100
-0.057 to 0.262

Middle 50% Average

0.829
Above the Typical Range39 Included Plays
Above the Typical Range37 Included Plays

906 offensive team-game performances. Higher means more offensive value per play in this comparison.

Offensive Consistency

· How often plays gained enough for their situation.

Sample Average41.6%
35.5% to 47.6%

Middle 50% Average

69.2%
Above the Typical Range39 Included Plays
Above the Typical Range37 Included Plays

906 offensive team-game performances. Higher means more offensive consistency in this comparison.

Value of Successful Plays

· How much value the successful plays created.

Sample Average1.240
1.078 to 1.393

Middle 50% Average

1.470
Above the Typical Range39 Included Plays
Above the Typical Range37 Included Plays

906 offensive team-game performances. Higher means more offensive value on successful plays in this comparison.

PPA by Play Type and Quarter
TeamPassingRushingQ1Q2Q3Q4
1.0550.6150.6230.9411.5190.000
0.0870.5930.4230.2323.6861.213

All values are PPA per included play. Season benchmarks above describe whole-game offense, so they are not applied to these smaller splits.

Sources & Update Details

Statistics are checked again after the final for late updates and corrections.