College FootballLoading Scores…All Games →
Published AP Ballots — 11 Verified Current-Season Polls

An updated report is being checked. These statistics show the last verified version.

Football Games / November 6, 2026

Virginia Tech at SMU

The result, the player statistics, and the AP poll response.

Final

Friday, November 6 at 6:00 PM CST · Gerald J. Ford Stadium

AP at Kickoff: NR

28

AP at Kickoff: NR

51
SMU Wins by 23Following Poll: Virginia Tech NR · SMU #25

Pregame Lines

Total O/U 56.5
Virginia Tech
Spread +6Moneyline +190
SMU
Spread −6Moneyline −230

Captured before kickoff: · CFBD scoreboard.

These are saved pregame prices. The provider does not identify the sportsbook or its price-update time. A dash means unavailable.

Last Update: · 9574 Minutes Ago
The Poll Response

SMU Enters the AP Top 25 at #25

SMU's 23-point win on November 6 was followed by the November 8 AP poll.

AP RankNR → #25
Voters Ranking SMU9 → 43Of 70 → 70 voters
Left Unranked27In the Following Poll
Compare the Pregame and Following Ballots →
Player Leaders

Offensive Leaders

Kevin JenningsPassing Leader
350Yards
Jeffrey Overton Jr.Rushing Leader
123Yards
Yamir KnightReceiving Leader
103Yards
All Player Statistics →

AP & Voters

How voters ranked these teams before the game, and what changed in the next poll.

Before Kickoff

November 1 AP Poll · 70 Complete Ballots

AP RankNR
Ranked By8 / 70
Left Unranked62 / 70
AP RankNR
Ranked By9 / 70
Left Unranked61 / 70
3Ranked Both Teams
56Ranked Neither Team

Among voters ranking both: 0 placed Virginia Tech higher; 3 placed SMU higher. Rankings are not game predictions.

Explore the Pregame Poll →

In the Following Poll

November 8 AP Poll

Before KickoffNR
Following PollNR

8 of 70 → 0 of 70 voters ranked Virginia Tech.

70 Left Unranked
Before KickoffNR
Following Poll#25

9 of 70 → 43 of 70 voters ranked SMU.

27 Left UnrankedRanked Votes: #17–#25

Voter counts can change between polls. This describes what changed, not why each voter changed their ballot.

Explore the Following Poll →

Player Stats

Choose a team and category to explore every available player.

PlayerC/ATTYDSTDINT
Ethan Grunkemeyer28/382917.711

Virginia Tech · Passing. A dash means unavailable. Dotted terms have explanations on hover, focus or tap.

2026 Season

Season Before This Game

Results from completed games before kickoff. Points are per game and include all opponents.

Record
6–2
Points Scored
35.0
Points Allowed
20.5

8 Completed Games

Record
6–2
Points Scored
35.3
Points Allowed
22.3

8 Completed Games

Team Stats

Final team statistics.

Statistic
Total Yards417569
Passing Yards291350
Rushing Yards126219
Turnovers21
Third Downs7-128-12
Possession28:4331:17
Full Team Box Score
StatisticVirginia TechSMU
Rushing Touchdowns32
Passing Touchdowns14
Kick Return Yards190
Kick Return Touchdowns00
Kick Returns12
Kicking Points215
Interception Return Yards2212
Interception Return Touchdowns00
Passes Intercepted11
Fumbles Recovered01
Total Fumbles11
Tackles for Loss77
Defensive Touchdowns00
Tackles2730
Sacks14
Quarterback Hurries22
Passes Deflected11
Possession28:4331:17
Interceptions Thrown11
Fumbles Lost10
Turnovers21
Penalties / Yards4-454-32
Yards per Carry4.56.1
Rushing Attempts2836
Rushing Yards126219
Yards per Pass Attempt7.710.9
Completions / Attempts28-3824-32
Passing Yards291350
Total Yards417569
Fourth Downs1-20-0
Third Downs7-128-12
First Downs2326
Punt Return Yards—-1
Punt Return Touchdowns—0
Punt Returns—1
Score by Quarter
TeamQ1Q2Q3Q4Final
Virginia Tech01401428
SMU1013141451

Advanced Analysis

Compare this game with a measured season average and the typical range.

The Comparison Sample

2026 FBS vs. FBS games started before November 6 at 7:00 PM EST. 507 of 507 eligible games have both offenses available. Each team-game counts equally; both offenses need at least 20 included plays.

These comparisons include garbage-time plays and are not opponent-adjusted. A typical range describes the middle half of this sample, not a universal good/bad cutoff.

Offensive Value per Play

· Higher means more expected scoring value gained.

Sample Average0.099
-0.061 to 0.254

Middle 50% Average

Above the Typical Range52 Included Plays
0.464
Above the Typical Range56 Included Plays

1014 offensive team-game performances. Higher means more offensive value per play in this comparison.

Offensive Consistency

· How often plays gained enough for their situation.

Sample Average41.5%
35.5% to 47.5%

Middle 50% Average

Within the Typical Range52 Included Plays
55.4%
Above the Typical Range56 Included Plays

1014 offensive team-game performances. Higher means more offensive consistency in this comparison.

Value of Successful Plays

· How much value the successful plays created.

Sample Average1.245
1.078 to 1.399

Middle 50% Average

Above the Typical Range52 Included Plays
1.370
Within the Typical Range56 Included Plays

1014 offensive team-game performances. Higher means more offensive value on successful plays in this comparison.

PPA by Play Type and Quarter
TeamPassingRushingQ1Q2Q3Q4
0.1600.3840.2830.550-0.2460.615
0.3950.5710.5180.3020.755-0.222

All values are PPA per included play. Season benchmarks above describe whole-game offense, so they are not applied to these smaller splits.

Sources & Update Details

Statistics are checked again after the final for late updates and corrections.