College FootballLoading Scores…All Games →
Published AP Ballots — 11 Verified Current-Season Polls

An updated report is being checked. These statistics show the last verified version.

Football Games / November 7, 2026

Rice at North Texas

The result, the player statistics, and the AP poll response.

Final

Saturday, November 7 at 3:00 PM CST · DATCU Stadium

AP at Kickoff: NR

23

AP at Kickoff: NR

52
North Texas Wins by 29Following Poll: Rice NR · North Texas NR

Pregame Lines

Total O/U 64.5
Rice
Spread +15.5Moneyline +600
North Texas
Spread −15.5Moneyline −900

Captured before kickoff: · CFBD scoreboard.

These are saved pregame prices. The provider does not identify the sportsbook or its price-update time. A dash means unavailable.

Last Update: · 7949 Minutes Ago
The Poll Response

North Texas in the Following AP Poll

North Texas's 29-point win on November 7 was followed by the November 8 AP poll.

AP RankNR → NR
Voters Ranking North Texas0 → 2Of 70 → 70 voters
Left Unranked68In the Following Poll
Compare the Pregame and Following Ballots →
Player Leaders

Offensive Leaders

Tayven JacksonPassing Leader
303Yards
Jahiem WhiteRushing Leader
139Yards
Justin StevensonReceiving Leader
117Yards
All Player Statistics →

AP & Voters

How voters ranked these teams before the game, and what changed in the next poll.

Before Kickoff

November 1 AP Poll · 70 Complete Ballots

AP RankNR
Ranked By0 / 70
Left Unranked70 / 70
AP RankNR
Ranked By0 / 70
Left Unranked70 / 70
0Ranked Both Teams
70Ranked Neither Team

No voter ranked both teams, so there is no head-to-head ordering to compare. Rankings are not game predictions.

Explore the Pregame Poll →

In the Following Poll

November 8 AP Poll

Before KickoffNR
Following PollNR

0 of 70 → 0 of 70 voters ranked Rice.

70 Left Unranked
Before KickoffNR
Following PollNR

0 of 70 → 2 of 70 voters ranked North Texas.

68 Left UnrankedRanked Votes: #25–#25

Voter counts can change between polls. This describes what changed, not why each voter changed their ballot.

Explore the Following Poll →

Player Stats

Choose a team and category to explore every available player.

PlayerC/ATTYDSTDINT
Gael Ochoa8/1317213.211
Patrick Crayton Jr.0/400.000

Rice · Passing. A dash means unavailable. Dotted terms have explanations on hover, focus or tap.

2026 Season

Season Before This Game

Results from completed games before kickoff. Points are per game and include all opponents.

Record
1–7
Points Scored
21.0
Points Allowed
31.8

8 Completed Games

Record
6–2
Points Scored
43.8
Points Allowed
31.9

8 Completed Games

Team Stats

Final team statistics.

Statistic
Total Yards433495
Passing Yards172303
Rushing Yards261192
Turnovers20
Third Downs4-116-11
Possession32:1027:50
Full Team Box Score
StatisticRiceNorth Texas
Rushing Touchdowns26
Punt Return Yards53
Punt Return Touchdowns00
Punt Returns21
Passing Touchdowns11
Kick Return Yards0—
Kick Return Touchdowns0—
Kick Returns1—
Kicking Points510
Fumbles Recovered01
Total Fumbles30
Tackles for Loss43
Defensive Touchdowns00
Tackles2929
Sacks22
Quarterback Hurries00
Passes Deflected53
Possession32:1027:50
Interceptions Thrown10
Fumbles Lost10
Turnovers20
Penalties / Yards7-779-98
Yards per Carry5.45.8
Rushing Attempts4833
Rushing Yards261192
Yards per Pass Attempt10.19.8
Completions / Attempts8-1718-31
Passing Yards172303
Total Yards433495
Fourth Downs1-11-1
Third Downs4-116-11
First Downs1926
Interception Return Yards—41
Interception Return Touchdowns—0
Passes Intercepted—1
Score by Quarter
TeamQ1Q2Q3Q4Final
Rice0710623
North Texas100212152

Advanced Analysis

Compare this game with a measured season average and the typical range.

The Comparison Sample

2026 FBS vs. FBS games started before November 7 at 4:00 PM EST. 512 of 538 eligible games have both offenses available. Each team-game counts equally; both offenses need at least 20 included plays.

These comparisons include garbage-time plays and are not opponent-adjusted. A typical range describes the middle half of this sample, not a universal good/bad cutoff.

Offensive Value per Play

· Higher means more expected scoring value gained.

Sample Average0.099
-0.060 to 0.254

Middle 50% Average

0.272
Above the Typical Range50 Included Plays
Above the Typical Range62 Included Plays

1024 offensive team-game performances. Higher means more offensive value per play in this comparison.

Offensive Consistency

· How often plays gained enough for their situation.

Sample Average41.5%
35.5% to 47.5%

Middle 50% Average

38.0%
Within the Typical Range50 Included Plays
Above the Typical Range62 Included Plays

1024 offensive team-game performances. Higher means more offensive consistency in this comparison.

Value of Successful Plays

· How much value the successful plays created.

Sample Average1.245
1.078 to 1.399

Middle 50% Average

1.680
Above the Typical Range50 Included Plays
Above the Typical Range62 Included Plays

1024 offensive team-game performances. Higher means more offensive value on successful plays in this comparison.

PPA by Play Type and Quarter
TeamPassingRushingQ1Q2Q3Q4
0.5930.1110.1520.4260.2440.409
0.4300.4850.762-0.0990.6720.778

All values are PPA per included play. Season benchmarks above describe whole-game offense, so they are not applied to these smaller splits.

Sources & Update Details

Statistics are checked again after the final for late updates and corrections.