College FootballLoading Scores…All Games →
Published AP Ballots — 11 Verified Current-Season Polls

An updated report is being checked. These statistics show the last verified version.

Football Games / October 3, 2026

UTEP at New Mexico

The result, the player statistics, and the AP poll response.

Final

Saturday, October 3 at 3:00 PM CDT · University Stadium (NM)

AP at Kickoff: NR

7

AP at Kickoff: NR

61
New Mexico Wins by 54Following Poll: UTEP NR · New Mexico NR

Pregame Lines

Pregame lines are unavailable in the saved record.

Last Update: · 58589 Minutes Ago
The Poll Response

New Mexico in the Following AP Poll

New Mexico's 54-point win on October 3 was followed by the October 4 AP poll.

AP RankNR → NR
Voters Ranking New Mexico0 → 0Of 70 → 70 voters
Left Unranked70In the Following Poll
Compare the Pregame and Following Ballots →
Player Leaders

Offensive Leaders

Toa FaavaePassing Leader
249Yards
Raymond Moore IIIRushing Leader
135Yards
DJ DarlingReceiving Leader
75Yards
All Player Statistics →

AP & Voters

How voters ranked these teams before the game, and what changed in the next poll.

Before Kickoff

September 27 AP Poll · 70 Complete Ballots

AP RankNR
Ranked By0 / 70
Left Unranked70 / 70
AP RankNR
Ranked By0 / 70
Left Unranked70 / 70
0Ranked Both Teams
70Ranked Neither Team

No voter ranked both teams, so there is no head-to-head ordering to compare. Rankings are not game predictions.

Explore the Pregame Poll →

In the Following Poll

October 4 AP Poll

Before KickoffNR
Following PollNR

0 of 70 → 0 of 70 voters ranked UTEP.

70 Left Unranked
Before KickoffNR
Following PollNR

0 of 70 → 0 of 70 voters ranked New Mexico.

70 Left Unranked

Voter counts can change between polls. This describes what changed, not why each voter changed their ballot.

Explore the Following Poll →

Player Stats

Choose a team and category to explore every available player.

PlayerC/ATTYDSTDINT
EJ Colson6/12453.801
Raymond Moore III1/5346.802
Braesen Leon1/12222.000

UTEP · Passing. A dash means unavailable. Dotted terms have explanations on hover, focus or tap.

2026 Season

Season Before This Game

Results from completed games before kickoff. Points are per game and include all opponents.

Record
1–3
Points Scored
18.8
Points Allowed
36.5

4 Completed Games

Record
3–1
Points Scored
39.0
Points Allowed
11.5

4 Completed Games

Team Stats

Final team statistics.

Statistic
Total Yards271493
Passing Yards101262
Rushing Yards170231
Turnovers51
Third Downs4-127-12
Possession28:1931:28
Full Team Box Score
StatisticUTEPNew Mexico
Rushing Touchdowns13
Passing Touchdowns03
Kick Return Yards552
Kick Return Touchdowns00
Kick Returns31
Kicking Points111
Interception Return Yards1792
Interception Return Touchdowns01
Passes Intercepted13
Fumbles Recovered02
Total Fumbles30
Tackles for Loss410
Defensive Touchdowns02
Tackles3327
Sacks14
Quarterback Hurries11
Passes Deflected20
Possession28:1931:28
Interceptions Thrown31
Fumbles Lost20
Turnovers51
Penalties / Yards8-624-40
Yards per Carry4.95.5
Rushing Attempts3542
Rushing Yards170231
Yards per Pass Attempt5.611.4
Completions / Attempts8-1817-23
Passing Yards101262
Total Yards271493
Fourth Downs1-32-3
Third Downs4-127-12
First Downs1124
Punt Return Yards—31
Punt Return Touchdowns—0
Punt Returns—2
Score by Quarter
TeamQ1Q2Q3Q4Final
UTEP00077
New Mexico147162461

Advanced Analysis

Compare this game with a measured season average and the typical range.

The Comparison Sample

2026 FBS vs. FBS games started before October 3 at 4:00 PM EDT. 220 of 248 eligible games have both offenses available. Each team-game counts equally; both offenses need at least 20 included plays.

These comparisons include garbage-time plays and are not opponent-adjusted. A typical range describes the middle half of this sample, not a universal good/bad cutoff.

Offensive Value per Play

· Higher means more expected scoring value gained.

Sample Average0.102
-0.063 to 0.269

Middle 50% Average

-0.479
Below the Typical Range39 Included Plays
Within the Typical Range36 Included Plays

440 offensive team-game performances. Higher means more offensive value per play in this comparison.

Offensive Consistency

· How often plays gained enough for their situation.

Sample Average41.4%
35.3% to 47.6%

Middle 50% Average

23.1%
Below the Typical Range39 Included Plays
Above the Typical Range36 Included Plays

440 offensive team-game performances. Higher means more offensive consistency in this comparison.

Value of Successful Plays

· How much value the successful plays created.

Sample Average1.241
1.077 to 1.403

Middle 50% Average

1.340
Within the Typical Range39 Included Plays
Below the Typical Range36 Included Plays

440 offensive team-game performances. Higher means more offensive value on successful plays in this comparison.

PPA by Play Type and Quarter
TeamPassingRushingQ1Q2Q3Q4
-1.0580.031-0.091-0.172-1.4330.000
0.636-0.0310.3650.195-0.3680.000

All values are PPA per included play. Season benchmarks above describe whole-game offense, so they are not applied to these smaller splits.

Sources & Update Details

Statistics are checked again after the final for late updates and corrections.