College FootballLoading Scores…All Games →
Published AP Ballots — 11 Verified Current-Season Polls

An updated report is being checked. These statistics show the last verified version.

Football Games / November 7, 2026

Northern Illinois at San José State

The result, the player statistics, and the AP poll response.

Final

Saturday, November 7 at 3:00 PM CST · CEFCU Stadium

San José State Wins by 11Following Poll: Northern Illinois NR · San José State NR

Pregame Lines

Total O/U 52.5
Northern Illinois
Spread +11.5Moneyline +310
San José State
Spread −11.5Moneyline −400

Captured before kickoff: · CFBD scoreboard.

These are saved pregame prices. The provider does not identify the sportsbook or its price-update time. A dash means unavailable.

Last Update: · 7936 Minutes Ago
The Poll Response

San José State in the Following AP Poll

San José State's 11-point win on November 7 was followed by the November 8 AP poll.

AP RankNR → NR
Voters Ranking San José State0 → 0Of 70 → 70 voters
Left Unranked70In the Following Poll
Compare the Pregame and Following Ballots →
Player Leaders

Offensive Leaders

Daniel RolovichPassing Leader
231Yards
Elijah PorterRushing Leader
79Yards
DeAree RogersReceiving Leader
86Yards
All Player Statistics →

AP & Voters

How voters ranked these teams before the game, and what changed in the next poll.

Before Kickoff

November 1 AP Poll · 70 Complete Ballots

AP RankNR
Ranked By0 / 70
Left Unranked70 / 70
AP RankNR
Ranked By0 / 70
Left Unranked70 / 70
0Ranked Both Teams
70Ranked Neither Team

No voter ranked both teams, so there is no head-to-head ordering to compare. Rankings are not game predictions.

Explore the Pregame Poll →

In the Following Poll

November 8 AP Poll

Before KickoffNR
Following PollNR

0 of 70 → 0 of 70 voters ranked Northern Illinois.

70 Left Unranked
Before KickoffNR
Following PollNR

0 of 70 → 0 of 70 voters ranked San José State.

70 Left Unranked

Voter counts can change between polls. This describes what changed, not why each voter changed their ballot.

Explore the Following Poll →

Player Stats

Choose a team and category to explore every available player.

PlayerC/ATTYDSTDINT
Taron Dickens21/311986.411
George Dimopoulos5/56112.200

Northern Illinois · Passing. A dash means unavailable. Dotted terms have explanations on hover, focus or tap.

2026 Season

Season Before This Game

Results from completed games before kickoff. Points are per game and include all opponents.

Record
4–5
Points Scored
19.9
Points Allowed
22.3

9 Completed Games

Team Stats

Final team statistics.

Statistic
Total Yards400316
Passing Yards259231
Rushing Yards14185
Turnovers20
Third Downs4-123-15
Possession31:4628:11
Full Team Box Score
StatisticNorthern IllinoisSan José State
Rushing Touchdowns22
Punt Return Yards-4—
Punt Return Touchdowns0—
Punt Returns2—
Passing Touchdowns11
Kick Return Yards27—
Kick Return Touchdowns0—
Kick Returns2—
Kicking Points112
Fumbles Recovered01
Total Fumbles21
Tackles for Loss58
Defensive Touchdowns00
Tackles2649
Sacks15
Quarterback Hurries41
Passes Deflected23
Possession31:4628:11
Interceptions Thrown10
Fumbles Lost10
Turnovers20
Penalties / Yards6-604-34
Yards per Carry3.72.6
Rushing Attempts3833
Rushing Yards14185
Yards per Pass Attempt7.28.6
Completions / Attempts26-3616-27
Passing Yards259231
Total Yards400316
Fourth Downs0-43-3
Third Downs4-123-15
First Downs2414
Interception Return Yards—0
Interception Return Touchdowns—0
Passes Intercepted—1
Score by Quarter
TeamQ1Q2Q3Q4Final
Northern Illinois0130619
San José State10614030

Advanced Analysis

Compare this game with a measured season average and the typical range.

The Comparison Sample

2026 FBS vs. FBS games started before November 7 at 4:00 PM EST. 512 of 538 eligible games have both offenses available. Each team-game counts equally; both offenses need at least 20 included plays.

These comparisons include garbage-time plays and are not opponent-adjusted. A typical range describes the middle half of this sample, not a universal good/bad cutoff.

Offensive Value per Play

· Higher means more expected scoring value gained.

Sample Average0.099
-0.060 to 0.254

Middle 50% Average

Within the Typical Range73 Included Plays
Within the Typical Range62 Included Plays

1024 offensive team-game performances. Higher means more offensive value per play in this comparison.

Offensive Consistency

· How often plays gained enough for their situation.

Sample Average41.5%
35.5% to 47.5%

Middle 50% Average

Above the Typical Range73 Included Plays
Below the Typical Range62 Included Plays

1024 offensive team-game performances. Higher means more offensive consistency in this comparison.

Value of Successful Plays

· How much value the successful plays created.

Sample Average1.245
1.078 to 1.399

Middle 50% Average

Below the Typical Range73 Included Plays
Within the Typical Range62 Included Plays

1024 offensive team-game performances. Higher means more offensive value on successful plays in this comparison.

PPA by Play Type and Quarter
TeamPassingRushingQ1Q2Q3Q4
-0.1060.132-0.1200.569-0.493-0.002
0.3230.0070.3020.1280.299-0.426

All values are PPA per included play. Season benchmarks above describe whole-game offense, so they are not applied to these smaller splits.

Sources & Update Details

Statistics are checked again after the final for late updates and corrections.