College FootballLoading Scores…All Games →
Published AP Ballots — 11 Verified Current-Season Polls
Football Games / November 11, 2026

Sacramento State at Central Michigan

The result, the player statistics, and the AP poll response.

Final

Wednesday, November 11 at 6:30 PM CST · Kelly/Shorts Stadium

AP at Kickoff: NR

7

AP at Kickoff: NR

28
Central Michigan Wins by 21

Pregame Lines

Total O/U 42.5
Sacramento State
Spread +17Moneyline +650
Central Michigan
Spread −17Moneyline −1000

Captured before kickoff: · CFBD scoreboard.

These are saved pregame prices. The provider does not identify the sportsbook or its price-update time. A dash means unavailable.

Last Update: · 102 Minutes Ago
The Poll Response

Next AP Comparison Pending

Game statistics remain available below. A complete comparison with the following poll is not yet available.

Player Leaders

Offensive Leaders

Jadyn GlasserPassing Leader
105Yards
Nicholas WoodfordRushing Leader
119Yards
Nasir WilliamsReceiving Leader
57Yards
All Player Statistics →

AP & Voters

How voters ranked these teams before the game, and what changed in the next poll.

Before Kickoff

November 8 AP Poll · 70 Complete Ballots

AP RankNR
Ranked By0 / 70
Left Unranked70 / 70
AP RankNR
Ranked By0 / 70
Left Unranked70 / 70
0Ranked Both Teams
70Ranked Neither Team

No voter ranked both teams, so there is no head-to-head ordering to compare. Rankings are not game predictions.

Explore the Pregame Poll →

In the Following Poll

The next consecutive AP poll comparison is unavailable.

Player Stats

Choose a team and category to explore every available player.

PlayerC/ATTYDSTDINT
Brian Salazar13/281033.701

Sacramento State · Passing. A dash means unavailable. Dotted terms have explanations on hover, focus or tap.

2026 Season

Season Before This Game

Results from completed games before kickoff. Points are per game and include all opponents.

Record
2–8
Points Scored
17.0
Points Allowed
29.3

10 Completed Games

Team Stats

Final team statistics.

Statistic
Total Yards211424
Passing Yards103105
Rushing Yards108319
Turnovers11
Third Downs3-1011-18
Possession20:1239:48
Full Team Box Score
StatisticSacramento StateCentral Michigan
Rushing Touchdowns14
Passing Touchdowns00
Kick Return Yards3725
Kick Return Touchdowns00
Kick Returns41
Kicking Points14
Fumbles Recovered10
Total Fumbles02
Tackles for Loss51
Defensive Touchdowns00
Tackles3220
Sacks11
Quarterback Hurries65
Passes Deflected24
Possession20:1239:48
Interceptions Thrown10
Fumbles Lost01
Turnovers11
Penalties / Yards4-322-20
Yards per Carry6.45.7
Rushing Attempts1756
Rushing Yards108319
Yards per Pass Attempt3.75.5
Completions / Attempts13-2811-19
Passing Yards103105
Total Yards211424
Fourth Downs1-23-4
Third Downs3-1011-18
First Downs1024
Punt Return Yards—0
Punt Return Touchdowns—0
Punt Returns—1
Interception Return Yards—2
Interception Return Touchdowns—0
Passes Intercepted—1
Score by Quarter
TeamQ1Q2Q3Q4Final
Sacramento State07007
Central Michigan777728

Advanced Analysis

Compare this game with a measured season average and the typical range.

The Comparison Sample

2026 FBS vs. FBS games started before November 11 at 7:30 PM EST. 565 of 565 eligible games have both offenses available. Each team-game counts equally; both offenses need at least 20 included plays.

These comparisons include garbage-time plays and are not opponent-adjusted. A typical range describes the middle half of this sample, not a universal good/bad cutoff.

Offensive Value per Play

· Higher means more expected scoring value gained.

Sample Average0.101
-0.055 to 0.253

Middle 50% Average

Below the Typical Range45 Included Plays
Within the Typical Range76 Included Plays

1130 offensive team-game performances. Higher means more offensive value per play in this comparison.

Offensive Consistency

· How often plays gained enough for their situation.

Sample Average41.5%
35.6% to 47.5%

Middle 50% Average

Within the Typical Range45 Included Plays
Within the Typical Range76 Included Plays

1130 offensive team-game performances. Higher means more offensive consistency in this comparison.

Value of Successful Plays

· How much value the successful plays created.

Sample Average1.247
1.078 to 1.401

Middle 50% Average

Within the Typical Range45 Included Plays
Above the Typical Range76 Included Plays

1130 offensive team-game performances. Higher means more offensive value on successful plays in this comparison.

PPA by Play Type and Quarter
TeamPassingRushingQ1Q2Q3Q4
-0.3020.300-0.0690.338-0.401-0.214
-0.1710.3000.428-0.0430.2600.156

All values are PPA per included play. Season benchmarks above describe whole-game offense, so they are not applied to these smaller splits.

Sources & Update Details

Statistics are checked again after the final for late updates and corrections.