College FootballLoading Scores…All Games →
Published AP Ballots — 11 Verified Current-Season Polls
Football Games / October 24, 2026

Michigan State at UCLA

The result, the player statistics, and the AP poll response.

Final

Saturday, October 24 at 2:30 PM CDT · Rose Bowl

AP at Kickoff: NR

10

AP at Kickoff: #9

28
UCLA Wins by 18Following Poll: Michigan State NR · UCLA #7

Pregame Lines

Total O/U 43.5
Michigan State
Spread +16.5Moneyline +450
UCLA
Spread −16.5Moneyline −650

Captured before kickoff: · CFBD scoreboard.

These are saved pregame prices. The provider does not identify the sportsbook or its price-update time. A dash means unavailable.

Last Update: · 17906 Minutes Ago
The Poll Response

UCLA in the Following AP Poll

UCLA's 18-point win on October 24 was followed by the October 25 AP poll.

AP Rank#9 → #7
Voters Ranking UCLA70 → 70Of 70 → 70 voters
Left Unranked0In the Following Poll
Compare the Pregame and Following Ballots →
Player Leaders

Offensive Leaders

Ty DieffenbachPassing Leader
198Yards
Anthony WoodsRushing Leader
112Yards
Brian Rowe Jr.Receiving Leader
74Yards
All Player Statistics →

AP & Voters

How voters ranked these teams before the game, and what changed in the next poll.

Before Kickoff

October 18 AP Poll · 70 Complete Ballots

AP RankNR
Ranked By0 / 70
Left Unranked70 / 70
AP Rank#9
Ranked By70 / 70
Left Unranked0 / 70
0Ranked Both Teams
0Ranked Neither Team

No voter ranked both teams, so there is no head-to-head ordering to compare. Rankings are not game predictions.

Explore the Pregame Poll →

In the Following Poll

October 25 AP Poll

Before KickoffNR
Following PollNR

0 of 70 → 0 of 70 voters ranked Michigan State.

70 Left Unranked
Before Kickoff#9
Following Poll#7

70 of 70 → 70 of 70 voters ranked UCLA.

0 Left UnrankedRanked Votes: #2–#12

Voter counts can change between polls. This describes what changed, not why each voter changed their ballot.

Explore the Following Poll →

Player Stats

Choose a team and category to explore every available player.

PlayerC/ATTYDSTDINT
Leo Hannan9/15674.50156.6
Kayd Coffman4/10424.2112.2

Michigan State · Passing. A dash means unavailable. Dotted terms have explanations on hover, focus or tap.

2026 Season

Season Before This Game

Results from completed games before kickoff. Points are per game and include all opponents.

Record
2–5
Points Scored
21.3
Points Allowed
25.4

7 Completed Games

Record
6–0
Points Scored
35.5
Points Allowed
16.2

6 Completed Games

Team Stats

Final team statistics.

Statistic
Total Yards156443
Passing Yards109198
Rushing Yards47245
Turnovers32
Third Downs2-116-16
Possession24:0235:58
Full Team Box Score
StatisticMichigan StateUCLA
Rushing Touchdowns03
Passing Touchdowns11
Kick Return Yards1544
Kick Return Touchdowns00
Kick Returns13
Kicking Points44
Fumbles Recovered21
Total Fumbles13
Tackles for Loss26
Defensive Touchdowns00
Tackles5533
Sacks04
Quarterback Hurries45
Passes Deflected41
Possession24:0235:58
Interceptions Thrown20
Fumbles Lost12
Turnovers32
Penalties / Yards9-796-60
Yards per Carry1.65.1
Rushing Attempts2948
Rushing Yards47245
Yards per Pass Attempt4.46.4
Completions / Attempts13-2518-31
Passing Yards109198
Total Yards156443
Fourth Downs1-11-2
Third Downs2-116-16
First Downs1125
Punt Return Yards—5
Punt Return Touchdowns—0
Punt Returns—1
Interception Return Yards—67
Interception Return Touchdowns—0
Passes Intercepted—2
Score by Quarter
TeamQ1Q2Q3Q4Final
Michigan State700310
UCLA01414028

Advanced Analysis

Compare this game with a measured season average and the typical range.

The Comparison Sample

2026 FBS vs. FBS games started before October 24 at 3:30 PM EDT. 413 of 413 eligible games have both offenses available. Each team-game counts equally; both offenses need at least 20 included plays.

These comparisons include garbage-time plays and are not opponent-adjusted. A typical range describes the middle half of this sample, not a universal good/bad cutoff.

Offensive Value per Play

· Higher means more expected scoring value gained.

Sample Average0.104
-0.054 to 0.265

Middle 50% Average

Below the Typical Range56 Included Plays
0.032
Within the Typical Range80 Included Plays

826 offensive team-game performances. Higher means more offensive value per play in this comparison.

Offensive Consistency

· How often plays gained enough for their situation.

Sample Average41.7%
35.8% to 47.8%

Middle 50% Average

Below the Typical Range56 Included Plays
52.5%
Above the Typical Range80 Included Plays

826 offensive team-game performances. Higher means more offensive consistency in this comparison.

Value of Successful Plays

· How much value the successful plays created.

Sample Average1.241
1.075 to 1.394

Middle 50% Average

Below the Typical Range56 Included Plays
0.631
Below the Typical Range80 Included Plays

826 offensive team-game performances. Higher means more offensive value on successful plays in this comparison.

PPA by Play Type and Quarter
TeamPassingRushingQ1Q2Q3Q4
-0.261-0.3540.183-1.352-0.149-0.194
0.120-0.009-0.5510.1210.445-0.106

All values are PPA per included play. Season benchmarks above describe whole-game offense, so they are not applied to these smaller splits.

Sources & Update Details

Statistics are checked again after the final for late updates and corrections.