College FootballLoading Scores…All Games →
Published AP Ballots — 11 Verified Current-Season Polls
Football Games / October 17, 2026

Tulsa at Rice

The result, the player statistics, and the AP poll response.

Final

Saturday, October 17 at 3:30 PM CDT · Rice Stadium

AP at Kickoff: NR

38

AP at Kickoff: NR

17
Tulsa Wins by 21Following Poll: Tulsa NR · Rice NR

Pregame Lines

Total O/U 46.5
Tulsa
Spread −4.5Moneyline −185
Rice
Spread +4.5Moneyline +160

Captured before kickoff: · CFBD scoreboard.

These are saved pregame prices. The provider does not identify the sportsbook or its price-update time. A dash means unavailable.

Last Update: · 27843 Minutes Ago
The Poll Response

Tulsa in the Following AP Poll

Tulsa's 21-point win on October 17 was followed by the October 18 AP poll.

AP RankNR → NR
Voters Ranking Tulsa0 → 0Of 70 → 70 voters
Left Unranked70In the Following Poll
Compare the Pregame and Following Ballots →
Player Leaders

Offensive Leaders

Baylor HayesPassing Leader
249Yards
Jacurri BrownRushing Leader
154Yards
Oran Singleton Jr.Receiving Leader
87Yards
All Player Statistics →

AP & Voters

How voters ranked these teams before the game, and what changed in the next poll.

Before Kickoff

October 11 AP Poll · 70 Complete Ballots

AP RankNR
Ranked By0 / 70
Left Unranked70 / 70
AP RankNR
Ranked By0 / 70
Left Unranked70 / 70
0Ranked Both Teams
70Ranked Neither Team

No voter ranked both teams, so there is no head-to-head ordering to compare. Rankings are not game predictions.

Explore the Pregame Poll →

In the Following Poll

October 18 AP Poll

Before KickoffNR
Following PollNR

0 of 70 → 0 of 70 voters ranked Tulsa.

70 Left Unranked
Before KickoffNR
Following PollNR

0 of 70 → 0 of 70 voters ranked Rice.

70 Left Unranked

Voter counts can change between polls. This describes what changed, not why each voter changed their ballot.

Explore the Following Poll →

Player Stats

Choose a team and category to explore every available player.

PlayerC/ATTYDSTDINT
Baylor Hayes20/272499.23087.1

Tulsa · Passing. A dash means unavailable. Dotted terms have explanations on hover, focus or tap.

2026 Season

Season Before This Game

Results from completed games before kickoff. Points are per game and include all opponents.

Record
3–3
Points Scored
27.5
Points Allowed
23.3

6 Completed Games

Record
1–5
Points Scored
17.0
Points Allowed
27.5

6 Completed Games

Team Stats

Final team statistics.

Statistic
Total Yards401351
Passing Yards24962
Rushing Yards152289
Turnovers01
Third Downs6-114-11
Possession30:2829:32
Full Team Box Score
StatisticTulsaRice
Rushing Touchdowns22
Punt Return Yards6—
Punt Return Touchdowns0—
Punt Returns1—
Passing Touchdowns30
Kick Return Yards2853
Kick Return Touchdowns00
Kick Returns24
Kicking Points65
Fumbles Recovered10
Total Fumbles22
Tackles for Loss47
Defensive Touchdowns00
Tackles3435
Sacks31
Quarterback Hurries05
Passes Deflected14
Possession30:2829:32
Interceptions Thrown00
Fumbles Lost01
Turnovers01
Penalties / Yards6-637-75
Yards per Carry4.25.4
Rushing Attempts3654
Rushing Yards152289
Yards per Pass Attempt9.27.8
Completions / Attempts20-274-8
Passing Yards24962
Total Yards401351
Fourth Downs1-21-3
Third Downs6-114-11
First Downs2219
Score by Quarter
TeamQ1Q2Q3Q4Final
Tulsa02131438
Rice7100017

Advanced Analysis

Compare this game with a measured season average and the typical range.

The Comparison Sample

2026 FBS vs. FBS games started before October 17 at 4:30 PM EDT. 365 of 365 eligible games have both offenses available. Each team-game counts equally; both offenses need at least 20 included plays.

These comparisons include garbage-time plays and are not opponent-adjusted. A typical range describes the middle half of this sample, not a universal good/bad cutoff.

Offensive Value per Play

· Higher means more expected scoring value gained.

Sample Average0.103
-0.056 to 0.264

Middle 50% Average

0.304
Above the Typical Range63 Included Plays
0.087
Within the Typical Range63 Included Plays

730 offensive team-game performances. Higher means more offensive value per play in this comparison.

Offensive Consistency

· How often plays gained enough for their situation.

Sample Average41.8%
35.6% to 48.0%

Middle 50% Average

47.6%
Within the Typical Range63 Included Plays
41.3%
Within the Typical Range63 Included Plays

730 offensive team-game performances. Higher means more offensive consistency in this comparison.

Value of Successful Plays

· How much value the successful plays created.

Sample Average1.237
1.067 to 1.392

Middle 50% Average

1.342
Within the Typical Range63 Included Plays
1.249
Within the Typical Range63 Included Plays

730 offensive team-game performances. Higher means more offensive value on successful plays in this comparison.

PPA by Play Type and Quarter
TeamPassingRushingQ1Q2Q3Q4
0.723-0.073-0.1640.4150.3180.497
-0.8210.2880.5070.491-0.037-0.475

All values are PPA per included play. Season benchmarks above describe whole-game offense, so they are not applied to these smaller splits.

Sources & Update Details

Statistics are checked again after the final for late updates and corrections.