College FootballLoading Scores…All Games →
Published AP Ballots — 11 Verified Current-Season Polls

An updated report is being checked. These statistics show the last verified version.

Football Games / October 17, 2026

Louisiana Tech at UL Monroe

The result, the player statistics, and the AP poll response.

Final

Saturday, October 17 at 7:00 PM CDT · Malone Stadium

AP at Kickoff: NR

24

AP at Kickoff: NR

0
Louisiana Tech Wins by 24Following Poll: Louisiana Tech NR · UL Monroe NR

Pregame Lines

Total O/U 56
Louisiana Tech
Spread −15.5Moneyline −700
UL Monroe
Spread +15.5Moneyline +475

Captured before kickoff: · CFBD scoreboard.

These are saved pregame prices. The provider does not identify the sportsbook or its price-update time. A dash means unavailable.

Last Update: · 38328 Minutes Ago
The Poll Response

Louisiana Tech in the Following AP Poll

Louisiana Tech's 24-point win on October 17 was followed by the October 18 AP poll.

AP RankNR → NR
Voters Ranking Louisiana Tech0 → 0Of 70 → 70 voters
Left Unranked70In the Following Poll
Compare the Pregame and Following Ballots →
Player Leaders

Offensive Leaders

Blake BakerPassing Leader
178Yards
Andrew BurnetteRushing Leader
66Yards
Marcus Calwise Jr.Receiving Leader
119Yards
All Player Statistics →

AP & Voters

How voters ranked these teams before the game, and what changed in the next poll.

Before Kickoff

October 11 AP Poll · 70 Complete Ballots

AP RankNR
Ranked By0 / 70
Left Unranked70 / 70
AP RankNR
Ranked By0 / 70
Left Unranked70 / 70
0Ranked Both Teams
70Ranked Neither Team

No voter ranked both teams, so there is no head-to-head ordering to compare. Rankings are not game predictions.

Explore the Pregame Poll →

In the Following Poll

October 18 AP Poll

Before KickoffNR
Following PollNR

0 of 70 → 0 of 70 voters ranked Louisiana Tech.

70 Left Unranked
Before KickoffNR
Following PollNR

0 of 70 → 0 of 70 voters ranked UL Monroe.

70 Left Unranked

Voter counts can change between polls. This describes what changed, not why each voter changed their ballot.

Explore the Following Poll →

Player Stats

Choose a team and category to explore every available player.

PlayerC/ATTYDSTDINT
Blake Baker15/211788.520
Sergio Snider1/122.000
Trey Kukuk0/100.001

Louisiana Tech · Passing. A dash means unavailable. Dotted terms have explanations on hover, focus or tap.

2026 Season

Season Before This Game

Results from completed games before kickoff. Points are per game and include all opponents.

Record
3–2
Points Scored
35.2
Points Allowed
29.4

5 Completed Games

Record
0–5
Points Scored
24.0
Points Allowed
44.6

5 Completed Games

Team Stats

Final team statistics.

Statistic
Total Yards332226
Passing Yards180151
Rushing Yards15275
Turnovers13
Third Downs6-133-11
Possession31:1628:07
Full Team Box Score
StatisticLouisiana TechUL Monroe
Rushing Touchdowns10
Punt Return Yards145
Punt Return Touchdowns00
Punt Returns12
Passing Touchdowns20
Kick Return Yards12—
Kick Return Touchdowns0—
Kick Returns1—
Kicking Points6—
Interception Return Yards64-1
Interception Return Touchdowns00
Passes Intercepted21
Tackles for Loss55
Defensive Touchdowns00
Tackles2133
Sacks03
Quarterback Hurries21
Passes Deflected33
Possession31:1628:07
Interceptions Thrown12
Fumbles Lost01
Turnovers13
Penalties / Yards3-3110-113
Yards per Carry3.93.4
Rushing Attempts3922
Rushing Yards15275
Yards per Pass Attempt7.85.2
Completions / Attempts16-2317-29
Passing Yards180151
Total Yards332226
Fourth Downs1-11-3
Third Downs6-133-11
First Downs1812
Fumbles Recovered—0
Total Fumbles—1
Score by Quarter
TeamQ1Q2Q3Q4Final
Louisiana Tech00141024
UL Monroe00000

Advanced Analysis

Compare this game with a measured season average and the typical range.

The Comparison Sample

2026 FBS vs. FBS games started before October 17 at 8:00 PM EDT. 339 of 379 eligible games have both offenses available. Each team-game counts equally; both offenses need at least 20 included plays.

These comparisons include garbage-time plays and are not opponent-adjusted. A typical range describes the middle half of this sample, not a universal good/bad cutoff.

Offensive Value per Play

· Higher means more expected scoring value gained.

Sample Average0.101
-0.063 to 0.266

Middle 50% Average

Within the Typical Range60 Included Plays
-0.271
Below the Typical Range46 Included Plays

678 offensive team-game performances. Higher means more offensive value per play in this comparison.

Offensive Consistency

· How often plays gained enough for their situation.

Sample Average41.6%
35.3% to 48.0%

Middle 50% Average

Within the Typical Range60 Included Plays
Within the Typical Range46 Included Plays

678 offensive team-game performances. Higher means more offensive consistency in this comparison.

Value of Successful Plays

· How much value the successful plays created.

Sample Average1.238
1.069 to 1.392

Middle 50% Average

Within the Typical Range60 Included Plays
Below the Typical Range46 Included Plays

678 offensive team-game performances. Higher means more offensive value on successful plays in this comparison.

PPA by Play Type and Quarter
TeamPassingRushingQ1Q2Q3Q4
0.3510.051-0.124-0.1030.4190.605
-0.421-0.0990.507-0.331-0.588-0.495

All values are PPA per included play. Season benchmarks above describe whole-game offense, so they are not applied to these smaller splits.

Sources & Update Details

Statistics are checked again after the final for late updates and corrections.